Comparison of Current Bear to Bear Markets of 1929, 1973-74, 1987 suggests Dow 3,500 possible

GMI0/6
GMI-R0/10
T210813%

I am getting tired of listening to all of the pundits saying that the current decline resembles the 1974 bear or the 1987 bear markets.   How about looking at some data!   So, I used my TC2007 market price history database to compute how much the Dow Jones Industrial average declined in prior bear markets after the market’s peak.

The results, presented in the table below, are quite revealing and unsettling if one is looking for a near term bottom.   I would be interested to learn if you agree with my analysis.

Twenty days after the Dow had peaked, the Dow   was down 7-10% in each of these beginning bear markets. By 40 days post Dow peak, the 1987 decline had already bottomed out (-41% by day 39) and rebounded to -26%.   The ferocity of the 1929 bear was evident early on, showing a 40% decline by day 40.   In comparison, the 1973 and 2007 bears appear puny, registering only 4% to 8% declines by day 40.   The 1973 and 2007 bears tracked each other quite closely until 260 days post the Dow peak.   By day 260, the 2007 bear was actually showing a greater than the decline that started in 1929 (-40% vs. -38%) and was more than twice the decline shown in the 1973 bear market (-17%). Since day 260,   the current bear market has resembled the 1929 bear market closely, with declines being about 14 percentage points smaller.   I would conclude then, that the current bear market is tracking much closer to the one that began in 1929 than to the 1973 and 1987 bears.

Read more

GMI and GMI-R are back to zero, QQQQ in new down-trend; TSYS and GLD; short or in cash

GMI0/6
GMI-R0/10
T210821%

The GMI and GMI-R have been zero since Tuesday’s close.   There were 3 new highs and 424 new lows in my universe of 4,000 stocks on Wednesday. The Worden T2108 Indicator is now 21% and heading down from the reading of 89% on January 6.   In the November swoon, this indicator bottomed at 1.2%.   So we have a long ways to go to hit the same depths present at the November bottom.   The QQQQ is now in the 2nd day of a new short term down-trend.

If you go back a few posts you will see that I wrote that TSYS looked like a break-out from a cup-with-handle formation.   Well, that stock continues to surge higher and hit a nine year high ($9.93) on Wednesday.   William O’Neil has said not to buy break-outs in a bear market, but this may be the one needle in a haystack that will work out.   I continue to hold a few shares of TSYS…..

I am also holding puts on some stocks in my IRA.   One cannot use margin in an IRA so I cannot short stocks there.   But I can buy put options or inverse ETF’s.   I don’t know if it is too late to short weak stocks, but I know that buying stocks that are in down-trends has not worked for me.   Then again, my friend Judy does so well buying stocks that bounce off of their lows.   In fact, she recently bought GLD in the 70’s and still holds some.   Gold and silver (SLV) have been steadily advancing.   I remain mainly in cash.

Jim Cramer finds (TA) religion; TSYS: cup with handle breakout? Indexes are weak, but some promising IBD100 stocks appear

GMI1/6
GMI-R4/10
T210840%

I know that the GMI has kept me and, I hope others, out of the long side of this market since at least August 2008, the last time that the GMI was 4.   I prefer the GMI to be at least 4 before I commit many IRA funds, and especially my university pension,   to the long side.   Since the GMI fell below 4 in late August, the QQQQ (Nasdaq100) and SPY(S&P 500) have declined 35%, and the DIA (Dow 30), by 31%.   During that same time period, 95% of the Nasdaq 100 stocks declined, 36% have declined more than 40%.   The biggest losers in the Nasdaq100 component stocks includes such well respected stocks as: RIMM, ISRG, and DELL (each down 63%), and JOYG (-69%)   and WYNN (-72%). As to   the “safe, buy and hold” Dow 30 stocks; 100% declined in this period, with whopping declines in: AXP (-58%), GE (-60%), GM (-75%), AA (-76%), C (-80%) and BAC (-81%).   Do you see why it does not make sense to fight the general market’s trend, as reflected in the GMI!

Speaking of the GMI, the table below shows

Read more