Markets remain in down-trend, technical indicators hold above last year’s lows

GMI0/6
GMI-R0/10
T21087%

I wrote a few posts ago about what market bottoms look like.   I showed that they are accompanied by huge weekly up volume.   Well, Wednesday’s rally came on low volume and Thursdays decline resumed on higher volume.   When we see declines on low volume, followed by rises on much higher volume we may have a turn.

Meanwhile, the QQQQ is in the 13th day of the current short term down-trend within its longer weekly down-trend.   During the past 13 days, the QQQQ fell about 13%, and 94% of this index’s 100 component stocks have declined–46% declined 15% or   more.   What this means is that shorting stocks or buying the inverse ETF’s has been profitable.   My successful new low indicator (the reverse of the successful new high component of the GMI) has been mostly above 80% during this down-trend.   What this indicator shows is that 80% of the stocks that hit a new low are trading lower 10 days later.   In contrast, there are not even enough (20) stocks hitting new highs to calculate the successful new high index.

So this is a market that has been great for shorts or for cash.   If I am still buying stocks in the hopes of a rise, I am fighting the tide–better to go to Las Vegas.   Why take a long shot (pun intended) when I can trade with the trend?

I would also note that my indicators have not   reached the low readings seen last year.   We had 1,103 new lows in my universe of 4,000 stocks on Thursday, but had over 2,000 daily lows last October.   Similarly, the T2108 is around 7%, but reached around 1% last October.

Until I see some high volume up days, I will remain mainly in cash or short.   To me, the best book on shorting is the one by Wiliam O’Neil, listed to the right.   This short book presents charts of   many past good shorts.   I, and my honors students,   use TC2007 to scan for stocks with technicals like O’Neil suggests.   I   bought puts on AXYS a few weeks ago because it looked promising.   Remember, fundamentals are irrelevant when looking to short.   The stock begins to decline long before the weak fundamentals behind the move become evident to the public…

Worden T2108 down to 6%; stock market bounce likely

GMI0/6
GMI-R0/10
T21086%

With the T2108 down to 6%, we are in severe oversold territory.   We had 7 new highs and 1080 new lows in my universe of 4,000 stocks on Tuesday.   While the T2108 got down to 1.2% in the October 9th decline in 2008, the T2108 often bottoms out somewhere below 10%.   I remain in cash and short.   With the major trends being down, a counter-trend rally could give an opportunity to increase my short positions.

No bottom in sight for this bear market–it’s just the beginning?

GMI0/6
GMI-R0/10
T210813%

I have written a number of times that one can ignore the fundamentals and all of the media pundits and just let the market tell us what it is likely to do.   When you are crossing the street and a truck comes bearing down on you at high speed, you should not argue with the fact that it is there.   You should not wait in the street for the truck to stop and/or exclaim incredulously that it should not be there.   One needs to move quickly and get out of the way or jump on board the truck,   if that is the goal.

I have been in cash for all of the major declines since 1995.   (I also avoided the 1987 debacle.) I have never been caught married to my long positions,   arguing with the market or hoping that a decline will end.   No one can detect a bottom until sometime after it has occurred.   Why do people look to experts to predict the market when none of them predicted the current decline!   Experts are really great at explaining to us after the fact, all of the reasons why the market declined.   When someone can tell me the reasons before the decline occurs, then I will listen.

So, what can the market tell us about how bear markets have ended?   I showed you several posts ago that the current market is tracking somewhere between the 1929-1932 and 1974 bear markets.   How did these huge declines end?   It turns out that they showed amazingly similar characteristics.  

Read more