Nicolas Darvas, on the value of studying one’s trading losses; RWB stocks, COST, RVBD

GMI6/6
GMI-R10/10
T210867%

I am reprinting below some of my writings from a few years ago in order to give my new students some understanding of my approach to the market.

“it is utterly useless for us on the outside, who buy and sell comparatively small blocks of stock, to conjecture about what “they” are doing.   We cannot know what the insiders intend to do, but we can see their orders on the tape when they execute them.   That is why my plea is for everyone of us to have no mere opinions of his own, but to allow the actions of the market to tell him what is passing.”

(Humphrey B. Neill, Tape Reading & Market Tactics, 1931, New York: B.C. Forbes Publishing Company; 14th printing, 2003, Vermont: Fraser Publishing Company)

When Nicolas Darvas was interviewed by Time Magazine in the early 60’s and it came out that he made almost 2 million dollars in the market in 18 months (while he was dancing around the world!), he noted that he read and reread Neill’s book (along with Gerald Loeb’s).   Neill’s book has been reprinted many times and I happened to find it on the shelf of my local Barnes and Noble store.   Neill dedicates his book, “to my losses, with a deep appreciation for the experience and knowledge which each loss has brought me.”

If anyone tells you that the market is different today, refer them to the successful traders from the 1929 post-crash era–Livermore, Baruch, Loeb.   Darvas, who made his fortune in the 60’s, clearly learned something from Neil’s original writings–and so have I.   (See list of books about these people to the lower right of this page.) Livermore used to say that when you have a losing trade, you were paying the tuition required by the market. As a college professor, I sometimes see students who pay tuition (more accurately, their parents pay) but are not focused on learning.   Losses can provide knowledge–but you have to study them.

Perhaps the most important thing I did a few years ago was, after a series of losing transactions, to print out their charts and write down my precise buy and sell points.   It looked like I had followed exceptionally accurate rules that flawlessly led me to buy at the top and sell at the bottom of moves!   So what did I do?   I reversed what I was doing and began to trade profitably.   Every great trader (including IBD publisher William O’Neil) urges us to study our losses.   However, most of us rarely do this important exercise in the market, or in other areas of our lives.

So, one of the major exercises that my class completes during the semester is to trade for nine weeks in a trading simulation   with a pretend $100,000 margin account.   They must keep careful records of all of their transactions and analyze them after the trading simulation ends to determine the technical mistakes behind their losses.   They then revise their rules for entering and exiting positions. We   should all review our transactions at least once per year……..

Meanwhile, the GMI and GMI-R remain at their maximum values. These two sets of indicators keep me on the right side of the market.   Most stocks follow the trend of the general market averages and it is absurd to fight the trend. There were 380 new 52 week highs on Friday in my universe of 4,000 stocks.   Buying stocks at new highs has been a good strategy lately;   79% of the stocks that hit a new high 10 days ago closed higher on Friday than they closed   10 days ago. The QQQQ (Nasdaq 100 Index) has been in a short term up-trend for 53 days.   And the longer term up-trend of the SPY (S&P 500 index ETF) and DIA (Dow 30 index ETF) has lasted for 21 weeks. The Worden T2108 indicator is at 67%, in neutral territory.   45% of the Nasdaq 100 stocks closed with their MACD above its signal line, a sign of short term strength.

It is therefore okay for me to have long (versus short) positions in this market.   My scan of the market has found a number of promising candidates.   Below is the weekly GMMA chart for COST. An RWB stock has all of its short term averages (red) above its rising longer term averages (blue).   This is a pattern of a stock in a strong up-trend. COST closed on Friday at $74.13, very close to its all-time high of $75.23. A close above $75.23 could be a sign of considerable strength for COST.   COST reports earnings on March 2nd.

Another RWB stock with a nice chart pattern is RVBD.   It looks like it bounced off of support recently and is not far from its all-time high.   If I bought RVBD, I would place a stop loss   below its 30 day average, around $34.95. The two “NA’s”on the chart indicate when IBD wrote about this company in its New America column, highlighting promising visionary companies. Next earnings for RVBD come out in April.

By the way, all of my students are required to get a student subscription to IBD and to read the newspaper daily.   IBD provides an abundance of technical and fundamental information about the types of growth stocks I buy.   Furthermore, most of my purchases come from stocks on their prior IBD 100 lists, now superseded by the IBD 50 list.   I never consistently made money trading until I started reading IBD in the 1980’s.

Nasdaq100 stocks (QQQQ): RWB up-trend; Ultra ETF’s outperform most stocks again

GMI6/6
GMI-R10/10
T210868%

I often show you the RWB rocket pattern as it applies to individual stocks.   It is the pattern of stocks in strong up-trends.   The Red, White and Blue pattern is evident in a weekly GMMA chart where all of the short term averages (red lines) are well above their rising longer term averages (blue lines) such that there is a white band between them.   It is noteworthy to me that the Nasdaq 100 index shows this powerful pattern. (Click on chart to enlarge.)

It may make sense to own some of this index by buying any of the bull ETF’s or ultra ETF’s that track it:   QQQQ, QLD, TQQQ. I usually wade into these in stages with each purchase having to be higher than the previous one.   I never add to a long position that is moving down–I always average up.

I have shown in prior posts that the ultra (2x or 3x) ETF’s often beat most individual stocks in an up-trend.   For example, since November 30, the QQQQ has advanced +9.5%, QLD +19.9% and TQQQQ +30.8%. In comparison, during the same time period only 3% of the Nasdaq 100 component stocks have advanced 30% or more and 17% advanced 20% or more.   We see, again, that   buying the ultra QQQQ ETF’s would have outperformed most individual stocks in that index.

It is even better than that, however. During this period only 5% of the S&P500 stocks rose 30% or more and only 20% rose 20% or more.   So the ultra QQQQ ETF’s outperformed most of the S&P500 stocks too.   Why search for the small minority of   individual stocks that will outperform the ultra ETF’s when one can just ride one of these ultra long ETF’s during a strong (RWB) up-trend.

51st day of current QQQQ short term up-trend; MCP–another of Judy’s winners

GMI6/6
GMI-R10/10
T210868%

The QQQQ short term up-trend reached its 50th day on Wednesday.   The prior up-trend lasted 51 days. Some short term up-trends in the past 5 years have gone on as long as 80 days, but 50 is quite old for a short term up-trend.   I am much more comfortable buying stocks when most people are bearish and there are few daily new highs and many new lows.   On Wednesday there were 427 new 52 week highs and 18 new lows in my universe of 4,000 stocks. With the municipal bond crisis and the associated state and local budget problems in the background, I remain with one foot out the door of this market.   These problems could take center stage once the euphoria surrounding earnings releases is over.   Plus we are not far from the, “sell in May and go away” period.

Read my response to the terrific comment I received at the bottom of Wednesday’s post.   It is true that with the municipal bond crisis as a context, I sold out my positions along with the market’s weakness last week (before Friday’s drop).   I have had a great period since September, with my margin account rising over 100% since September. To be successful in the market I have found that when I get whip-sawed by the market   I need to reverse quickly and buy back into the market   as long as my market indicators remain strong.   With the GMI at 6 and so many stocks in an up-trend   bouncing from support, it is easy to find things to buy.   But I remain very cautious and re-renter with small buys and buy only on the way up.

Therefore, I bought some March 38 (deep in the money) calls on   MCP on Wednesday after it found support at its 30 day average.   MCP is a prior “Judy’s pick.”   Judy liked the fact that MCP owns mines in the U.S. that contain rare earths, at a time when the largest producer of these minerals, China, is reducing exports.   Rare earths are required in many of the power components of green technology (like lithium batteries!).   Judy failed to buy (she tried) the stock during its recent IPO (initial public offering) at the end of July and instead bought MCP at around $13 in the open market   MCP caught on and traded as high as $62.78 in early January.   It retraced a little recently and showed renewed strength on Wednesday. If it weakens again I will sell out. You can see from the daily chart below (click on chart to enlarge) that MCP has found support at both its 30 day (red line) and 50 day (green) moving averages. MCP is different from most of the growth stocks I buy because it has yet to develop earnings.   But the future of rare earths is clearly motivating buyers. Kudos to Judy yet again for picking a winning well grounded (pun intended) concept stock (she also likes Lynas, another speculative (cheap) rare earth producer, which I own.)